Syntax III Winter 2008 Assignment 5 crave I crave to eat an artichoke heart. tend I tend to like fat monkeys. intend I intend to eat this pig's heart. pretend Bob pretended to eat the pig heart. contend The establishment contends that grades build character. choose I choose to eat pig hearts. dare I dare you to eat this pig's heart. make I made the pig eat bananas. see I saw the pig eat bananas. claim Bob claims to like pigs. likely The pigs are likely to bite you. sure The pigs are sure to taste good. confident We are confident that the pigs will be happy. certain The pigs are certain to be hungry. good Pig hearts are good to eat. pleasant Betty is pleasant to be with. eager I am eager to be with the pigs. urge I urge you to eat the pig's heart. ready The pigs are ready to eat. able We were able to see the pigs. odd Bob is odd to want to eat pig hearts. crazy It is crazy to want to eat pig hearts. pretty Betty is pretty to look at. clear It is clear that the pigs want out. a bitch That nut was a bitch to get off. an asshole Bob was an asshole to offer Shelley pig. Each item is a predicate, either a verb or an adjective or a noun which combines with `be` to yield the core of a verb phrase. The assignment is to choose at least three of these predicates and do the following: For each predicate chosen, do the following things: 1. Find out what surface complements it takes. Does it take that-clauses as subject or object? For-to clauses? Poss-ing clauses? VP complements (bare VP, to VP, ing VP)? 2. Present an analysis that accounts for the facts you have observed about your predicate. This will include a statement about the deep structure that the predicate occurs in, what transformations are allowed on this structure, whether any transformations are obligatory, and any further statements that are necessary to make the grammatical analysis accurate. 3. List some other predicates that (so far as you can tell) behave like the predicate chosen. If there are minor differences, note them. 4. Discuss at least one other predicate that shares at least one surface structure with the chosen predicate, but which is fundamentally different. For example, suppose your chosen predicate was 'hate'. Bob hated to carry out the garbage. A little investigation is going to reveal that this is a Subject-Subject Equi verb. Now we have to compare it to something else. Let's consider Bob needed to carry out the garbage. There is a difference, because There needs to be a place to put the garbage. *There hates to be a place to put the garbage. There has to be a reason for this difference. What is it? Now analyze the following: 1. tend 2. intend 3. need 4. have7 [I have to do my homework] 5. Sally proved to be a good linguist. 6. Sally was proved to be a good linguist.